How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. S6600 vs Neo Mini

Aligator S6600 vs Olympia Neo Mini

What S6600 does better (7) and where Neo Mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Aligator S6600
Aligator · 2026S6600
4.1Score
7 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Olympia Neo Mini
Olympia · 2026Neo Mini
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $110
3.0Camera2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

S6600Neo Mini
76.7 × 166.39.674 × 148
S6600Neo MiniDifference
Height166.3 mm148 mm+18.3 mm
Width76.7 mm74 mm+2.7 mm
Weight190 g124 g+66 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is S6600 better than Neo Mini?

  1. Main camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
  2. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 2,800 mAh+43%
  3. Storage (max)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  4. RAM4 GB vs 3 GB+33%
  5. Selfie camera5 MP vs 2 MP2.5×
  6. Screen size6.6″ vs 5″+32%
  7. Storage (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×

Why is Neo Mini better than S6600?

  1. Weight190 g vs 124 g+53%
Specifications

Side by side

Aligator S6600Aligator S6600≈ $904.1
Olympia Neo MiniOlympia Neo Mini≈ $1104.0
Design
Weight190 g124 g
Thickness9.6 mm—
Height166.3 mm148 mm
Width76.7 mm74 mm
ColoursBlueBlack
Display
Screen size6.6″5″
PanelIPS TFT—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)720 px—
Resolution (height)1,600 px—
Pixel density266 ppi—
Screen-to-body ratio82.5%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A—
Chip makerUnisoc—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency1.6 GHz—
GPUIMG8322 @550 MHz—
Memory
RAM4 GB3 GB
Storage (max)64 GB32 GB
Storage (base)64 GB32 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera13 MP5 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Selfie camera5 MP2 MP
Battery
Battery capacity4,000 mAh2,800 mAh
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
NFCNoNo
Features
Sensorsfingerprint—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
EU label
Energy class—G
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare