How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. S6600 vs Neo

Aligator S6600 vs Olympia Neo

What S6600 does better (3) and where Neo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Aligator S6600
Aligator · 2026S6600
4.1Score
3 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
vs
Olympia Neo
Olympia · 2026Neo
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $130
3.0Camera2.4
2.7Battery2.3
3.0Features2.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

S6600Neo
76.7 × 166.39.670.8 × 156.29.3
S6600NeoDifference
Height166.3 mm156.2 mm+10.1 mm
Width76.7 mm70.8 mm+5.9 mm
Thickness9.6 mm9.3 mm+0.3 mm
Weight190 g171 g+19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is S6600 better than Neo?

  1. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 2,750 mAh+45%
  2. Main camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
  3. Screen size6.6″ vs 5.5″+20%

Why is Neo better than S6600?

  1. Weight190 g vs 171 g+11%
  2. Thickness9.6 mm vs 9.3 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Aligator S6600Aligator S6600≈ $1304.1
Olympia NeoOlympia Neo≈ $1303.6
Design
Weight190 g171 g
Thickness9.6 mm9.3 mm
Height166.3 mm156.2 mm
Width76.7 mm70.8 mm
Ingress protection—IP44
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursBlue—
Display
Screen size6.6″5.5″
PanelIPS TFT—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)720 px—
Resolution (height)1,600 px—
Pixel density266 ppi—
Screen-to-body ratio82.5%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A—
Chip makerUnisoc—
CPU cores8—
Memory
RAM4 GB4 GB
Storage (max)64 GB64 GB
Storage (base)64 GB64 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera13 MP8 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Selfie camera5 MP5 MP
Battery
Battery capacity4,000 mAh2,750 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMYesYes
NFCNoNo
Features
Fingerprint sensor—Rear
Sensorsfingerprintfingerprint
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
EU label
Energy class—G
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare