- android.gs
- Compare
- Super ZX vs Poco M7 4G
Acer Super ZX vs Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
What Super ZX does better (5) and where Poco M7 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.4
6.1Camera4.6
6.0Battery8.3
4.6Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Super ZXPoco M7 4G
| Super ZX | Poco M7 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169 mm | 171.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 80.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 200 g | 224 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Super ZX better than Poco M7 4G?
- 5GYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Weight200 g vs 224 g+12%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 374 ppi+4%
Why is Poco M7 4G better than Super ZX?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 850 nits+6%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 169 mm | 171.1 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP50 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Carbon Black, Cosmic Green, Lunar Blue | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 482,788 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,519 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | — | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
