Same price ≈ $550
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- eSIM
- Pixel density 460 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- AnTuTu score 2,830,117 vs 3,897,821
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Redmi K90 Pro Max — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Redmi K90 Pro Max
Same price ≈ $530
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Peak brightness 4,400 nits vs 3,500 nits
- Pixel density 453 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 560 Hz
- AnTuTu score 2,391,014 vs 3,897,821
7% pricier ≈ $580
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- AnTuTu score 4,037,547 vs 3,897,821
- Pixel density 461 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 7,560 mAh
4% cheaper ≈ $520
- Battery capacity 10,000 mAh vs 7,560 mAh
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- AnTuTu score 3,991,174 vs 3,897,821
- Refresh rate 185 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
Same price ≈ $540
- 4K video frame rate 120 fps vs 60 fps
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx9 vs IPx8
- Pixel density 430 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Wireless charging
11% cheaper ≈ $480
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- Pixel density 453 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Weight 212 g vs 218 g
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Wireless charging
15% cheaper ≈ $460
- eSIM
- Weight 199 g vs 218 g
- AnTuTu score 2,480,773 vs 3,897,821
- Battery capacity 6,210 mAh vs 7,560 mAh
Same price ≈ $550
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
- eSIM
- Pixel density 460 ppi vs 416 ppi
- AnTuTu score 1,948,966 vs 3,897,821
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
9% cheaper ≈ $490
- Weight 191 g vs 218 g
- Pixel density 461 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Selfie camera 50 MP vs 32 MP
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- AnTuTu score 2,974,201 vs 3,897,821
7% pricier ≈ $580
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- eSIM
- Weight 186 g vs 218 g
- AnTuTu score 1,805,009 vs 3,897,821
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz