Same price ≈ $870
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Measured brightness 2,113 nits vs 1,077 nits
- AnTuTu score 2,982,875 vs 2,720,760
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Active use (test) 12.8 h vs 18.9 h
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Poco F8 Ultra — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Poco F8 Ultra
4% cheaper ≈ $860
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
6% cheaper ≈ $840
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- AnTuTu score 2,914,061 vs 2,720,760
- Measured brightness 1,816 nits vs 1,077 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Active use (test) 13.6 h vs 18.9 h
16% pricier ≈ $1,050
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- AnTuTu score 2,973,303 vs 2,720,760
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
16% pricier ≈ $1,050
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 7,300 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
- AnTuTu score 2,790,237 vs 2,720,760
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Peak brightness 1,800 nits vs 3,500 nits
5% cheaper ≈ $850
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,238 vs 10,876
Same price ≈ $900
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- AnTuTu score 3,030,376 vs 2,720,760
- Measured brightness 1,588 nits vs 1,077 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Battery capacity 5,410 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
10% cheaper ≈ $800
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 201 g vs 218 g
- Pixel density 450 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 3,500 nits
5% cheaper ≈ $850
- AnTuTu score 5,498,720 vs 2,720,760
- Battery capacity 8,400 mAh vs 6,500 mAh
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
9% pricier ≈ $970
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Active use (test) 21.8 h vs 18.9 h
- Weight 191 g vs 218 g
- Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 560 Hz
- Optical zoom 2.6× vs 5×