Same price ≈ $95
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx5 vs IPx2
- Battery capacity 6,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Main camera 8 MP vs 13 MP
- Weight 209 g vs 193 g
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Xiaomi Poco C81x
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Xiaomi Poco C81x
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Poco C81x — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Poco C81x
Same price ≈ $95
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx2
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 1,416 vs 1,469
Same price ≈ $95
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- CPU frequency 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- AnTuTu score 318,543 vs 350,705
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
Same price ≈ $95
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx5 vs IPx2
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- Peak brightness 590 nits vs 650 nits
12% pricier ≈ $110
- Battery capacity 6,300 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx2
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Main camera 8 MP vs 13 MP
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
11% cheaper ≈ $85
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx2
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Main camera aperture f/1.9 vs f/2.2
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- Screen size 6.7″ vs 6.9″
Same price ≈ $95
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx2
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Screen-to-body ratio 87.6% vs 84.1%
- Wired charging 10 W vs 15 W
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
12% pricier ≈ $110
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Storage (base) 32 GB vs 64 GB
12% pricier ≈ $110
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- AnTuTu score 364,670 vs 350,705
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 1,377 vs 1,469
- Peak brightness 600 nits vs 650 nits
12% pricier ≈ $110
- Battery capacity 6,300 mAh vs 5,200 mAh
- Major OS updates promised 4 vs 2
- RAM 4 GB vs 3 GB
- AnTuTu score 326,769 vs 350,705
- Weight 208 g vs 193 g