How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Xiaomi 18 Pro Max
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Xiaomi 18 Pro Max

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 18 Pro Max — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Xiaomi 18 Pro Max
Xiaomi · 2026
18 Pro Max
6.9″Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 68,500 mAh200 MP
approx. price≈ $990
9.7

Alternatives to the 18 Pro Max

Honor Magic9 Pro Max
1
Honor · 2026Magic9 Pro Max
9.7
7% cheaper ≈ $920
  • AnTuTu score 5,524,187 vs 5,001,234
  • Battery capacity 8,800 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • eSIM
  • Peak brightness 2,000 nits vs 4,000 nits
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 160 Hz
OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
2
OPPO · 2026Find X10 Pro Max
9.6
Same price ≈ $960
  • eSIM
  • Pixel density 450 ppi vs 418 ppi
  • Main camera aperture f/1.5 vs f/1.7
  • Battery capacity 7,150 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Wired charging 80 W vs 100 W
Realme 16 Pro+
3
Realme · 202616 Pro+
9.6
Same price ≈ $980
  • Peak brightness 6,500 nits vs 4,000 nits
  • eSIM
  • Weight 198 g vs 235 g
  • AnTuTu score 1,147,970 vs 5,001,234
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,982 vs 11,459
Vivo X500 Pro Max
4
Vivo · 2026X500 Pro Max
9.7
Same price ≈ $980
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 12,688 vs 11,459
  • Pixel density 507 ppi vs 418 ppi
  • 4K video frame rate 240 fps vs 120 fps
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • Battery capacity 8,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
OnePlus 16
5
OnePlus · 202616
9.7
13% cheaper ≈ $860
  • Battery capacity 9,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Refresh rate 185 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 11,891 vs 11,459
  • Peak brightness 2,000 nits vs 4,000 nits
  • AnTuTu score 4,627,389 vs 5,001,234
OPPO Reno16 Pro
6
OPPO · 2026Reno16 Pro
9.6
Same price ≈ $970
  • Weight 188 g vs 235 g
  • eSIM
  • Pixel density 460 ppi vs 418 ppi
  • AnTuTu score 1,762,580 vs 5,001,234
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,208 vs 11,459
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
7
Xiaomi · 2026Poco F9 Ultra
9.7
10% cheaper ≈ $890
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.2×
  • Refresh rate 185 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • eSIM
  • AnTuTu score 4,165,108 vs 5,001,234
  • Battery capacity 8,050 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+
8
9.7
Same price ≈ $1,000
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 13,894 vs 11,459
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
  • Refresh rate 185 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • Telephoto camera
Honor 600 Pro
9
Honor · 2026600 Pro
9.6
17% cheaper ≈ $820
  • Peak brightness 8,000 nits vs 4,000 nits
  • Weight 195 g vs 235 g
  • eSIM
  • AnTuTu score 2,221,352 vs 5,001,234
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
10
Samsung · 2026Galaxy S26 Ultra
9.6
11% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.2×
  • eSIM
  • Pixel density 500 ppi vs 418 ppi
  • AnTuTu score 2,627,986 vs 5,001,234
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare