How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 17 Ultra (China) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Xiaomi · 2025
17 Ultra (China)
6.9″Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 56,800 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $920
9.7

Alternatives to the 17 Ultra (China)

Vivo X300 Pro
1
Vivo · 2025X300 Pro
9.6
5% cheaper ≈ $870
  • Measured brightness 2,113 nits vs 1,132 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,982,875 vs 2,777,490
  • Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Active use (test) 12.8 h vs 21.5 h
  • Battery capacity 6,510 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
Vivo X200 Ultra
2
Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra
9.6
9% cheaper ≈ $840
  • AnTuTu score 2,914,061 vs 2,777,490
  • Measured brightness 1,816 nits vs 1,132 nits
  • Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Active use (test) 13.6 h vs 21.5 h
  • Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
Realme GT 7
3
Realme · 2025GT 7
9.6
7% cheaper ≈ $860
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 90 W
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,141,861 vs 2,777,490
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 4.2×
Vivo iQOO 15
4
Vivo · 2025iQOO 15
9.7
12% pricier ≈ $1,050
  • AnTuTu score 2,973,303 vs 2,777,490
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
  • Optical zoom 3× vs 4.2×
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,466 vs 10,896
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5
Xiaomi · 202515 Ultra
9.6
Same price ≈ $900
  • AnTuTu score 3,030,376 vs 2,777,490
  • Measured brightness 1,588 nits vs 1,132 nits
  • Pixel density 522 ppi vs 416 ppi
  • Battery capacity 5,410 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
  • Active use (test) 16.2 h vs 21.5 h
OnePlus 15
6
OnePlus · 202515
9.7
12% pricier ≈ $1,050
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 90 W
  • Battery capacity 7,300 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
  • Peak brightness 1,800 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Storage (base) 256 GB vs 512 GB
Vivo X300 FE
7
Vivo · 2026X300 FE
9.6
Same price ≈ $920
  • Measured brightness 1,774 nits vs 1,132 nits
  • Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • eSIM
  • AnTuTu score 2,234,101 vs 2,777,490
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
OPPO Reno14 Pro
8
OPPO · 2025Reno14 Pro
9.6
13% cheaper ≈ $800
  • eSIM
  • Weight 201 g vs 224 g
  • Pixel density 450 ppi vs 416 ppi
  • Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,406 vs 10,896
Honor Magic8 Pro
9
Honor · 2025Magic8 Pro
9.7
20% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • AnTuTu score 3,647,824 vs 2,777,490
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 90 W
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Active use (test) 19.1 h vs 21.5 h
  • Storage (base) 256 GB vs 512 GB
Realme GT 7T
10
Realme · 2025GT 7T
9.5
8% cheaper ≈ $850
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 90 W
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,800 mAh
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,238 vs 10,896
  • AnTuTu score 2,079,848 vs 2,777,490
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare