How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Xiaomi 17
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Xiaomi 17

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 17 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi · 2025
17
6.3″Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 56,330 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $970
9.6

Alternatives to the 17

Vivo iQOO 15
1
Vivo · 2025iQOO 15
9.7
6% pricier ≈ $1,050
  • AnTuTu score 2,973,303 vs 2,670,664
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Weight 215 g vs 191 g
OnePlus 15
2
OnePlus · 202515
9.7
6% pricier ≈ $1,050
  • Battery capacity 7,300 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,790,237 vs 2,670,664
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
  • Peak brightness 1,800 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Drop resistance class C vs A
Vivo X300 Pro
3
Vivo · 2025X300 Pro
9.6
10% cheaper ≈ $870
  • Measured brightness 2,113 nits vs 1,087 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,982,875 vs 2,670,664
  • Battery capacity 6,510 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • Active use (test) 12.8 h vs 21.8 h
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 160 Hz
Honor Magic8 Pro
4
Honor · 2025Magic8 Pro
9.7
13% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • AnTuTu score 3,647,824 vs 2,670,664
  • Battery capacity 7,100 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Active use (test) 19.1 h vs 21.8 h
Realme GT 7
5
Realme · 2025GT 7
9.6
12% cheaper ≈ $860
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
  • AnTuTu score 2,141,861 vs 2,670,664
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
Vivo X500 Pro Max
6
Vivo · 2026X500 Pro Max
9.7
Same price ≈ $980
  • AnTuTu score 4,838,033 vs 2,670,664
  • Battery capacity 8,000 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 12,688 vs 10,459
  • Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Wired charging 90 W vs 100 W
Realme GT 8 Pro
7
Realme · 2025GT 8 Pro
9.7
18% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Measured brightness 2,262 nits vs 1,087 nits
  • Peak brightness 7,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,955,505 vs 2,670,664
  • Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Active use (test) 20.4 h vs 21.8 h
Vivo X200 Ultra
8
Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra
9.6
14% cheaper ≈ $840
  • AnTuTu score 2,914,061 vs 2,670,664
  • Measured brightness 1,816 nits vs 1,087 nits
  • Optical zoom 3.7× vs 2.6×
  • Active use (test) 13.6 h vs 21.8 h
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 160 Hz
Motorola Signature
9
Motorola · 2026Signature
9.6
7% pricier ≈ $1,050
  • Peak brightness 6,200 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Measured brightness 1,518 nits vs 1,087 nits
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 160 Hz
  • Battery capacity 5,200 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,381,753 vs 2,670,664
Vivo X300 FE
10
Vivo · 2026X300 FE
9.6
5% cheaper ≈ $920
  • Battery capacity 6,500 mAh vs 6,330 mAh
  • Measured brightness 1,774 nits vs 1,087 nits
  • Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • AnTuTu score 2,234,101 vs 2,670,664
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare