How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Vivo X300 Pro
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Vivo X300 Pro

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the X300 Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo · 2025
X300 Pro
6.8″Dimensity 95006,510 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $870
9.6

Alternatives to the X300 Pro

Xiaomi 15 Ultra
1
Xiaomi · 202515 Ultra
9.6
Same price ≈ $900
  • Active use (test) 16.2 h vs 12.8 h
  • Rear cameras 4 vs 2
  • Wireless charging power 80 W vs 40 W
  • Battery capacity 5,410 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 4,500 nits
Realme GT 7
2
Realme · 2025GT 7
9.6
Same price ≈ $860
  • Active use (test) 21.1 h vs 12.8 h
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 90 W
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,141,861 vs 2,982,875
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
3
Xiaomi · 202517 Ultra (China)
9.7
6% pricier ≈ $920
  • Active use (test) 21.5 h vs 12.8 h
  • Battery capacity 6,800 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,896 vs 10,264
  • Measured brightness 1,132 nits vs 2,113 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,777,490 vs 2,982,875
OPPO Reno14 Pro
4
OPPO · 2025Reno14 Pro
9.6
8% cheaper ≈ $800
  • Weight 201 g vs 226 g
  • Rear cameras 3 vs 2
  • Wireless charging power 50 W vs 40 W
  • AnTuTu score 2,048,465 vs 2,982,875
  • Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits
Realme GT 7T
5
Realme · 2025GT 7T
9.5
Same price ≈ $850
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 90 W
  • Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,079,848 vs 2,982,875
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,238 vs 10,264
Vivo X200 Ultra
6
Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra
9.6
Same price ≈ $840
  • Active use (test) 13.6 h vs 12.8 h
  • Pixel density 510 ppi vs 452 ppi
  • Water resistance (IPx) IPx9 vs IPx8
  • Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,914,061 vs 2,982,875
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7
Xiaomi · 202517 Pro Max
9.7
10% cheaper ≈ $780
  • Active use (test) 20.8 h vs 12.8 h
  • Battery capacity 7,500 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Measured brightness 1,026 nits vs 2,113 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,456,317 vs 2,982,875
Xiaomi 17
8
Xiaomi · 202517
9.6
12% pricier ≈ $970
  • Active use (test) 21.8 h vs 12.8 h
  • Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Wired charging 100 W vs 90 W
  • Measured brightness 1,087 nits vs 2,113 nits
  • AnTuTu score 2,670,664 vs 2,982,875
Xiaomi 15S Pro
9
Xiaomi · 202515S Pro
9.6
16% cheaper ≈ $730
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.7×
  • Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
  • Pixel density 521 ppi vs 452 ppi
  • Measured brightness 941 nits vs 2,113 nits
  • Battery capacity 6,100 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
10
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F8 Ultra
9.7
Same price ≈ $890
  • Refresh rate 560 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Active use (test) 18.9 h vs 12.8 h
  • Wired charging 100 W vs 90 W
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Measured brightness 1,077 nits vs 2,113 nits
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare