How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Vivo X Fold6
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Vivo X Fold6

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the X Fold6 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Vivo X Fold6
Vivo · 2026
X Fold6
8″Dimensity 9500 Super6,900 mAh200 MP
approx. price≈ $2,250
9.4

Alternatives to the X Fold6

Motorola Razr Fold
1
Motorola · 2026Razr Fold
9.7
Same price ≈ $2,250
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,804 vs 3,390
  • Active use (test) 16.1 h vs 14.8 h
  • 4K selfie video
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • AnTuTu score 2,342,132 vs 2,751,330
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
2
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
9.2
15% cheaper ≈ $1,900
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 11,124 vs 3,390
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 6,772 vs 5,090
  • 4K video frame rate 120 fps vs 60 fps
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 80 W
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
Honor Magic V6
3
Honor · 2026Magic V6
9.6
22% cheaper ≈ $1,750
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,871 vs 3,390
  • AnTuTu score 3,080,707 vs 2,751,330
  • Active use (test) 15.3 h vs 14.8 h
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • Battery capacity 6,660 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
Xiaomi 18 Fold
4
Xiaomi · 202618 Fold
9.5
33% cheaper ≈ $1,500
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 13,491 vs 3,390
  • AnTuTu score 5,228,014 vs 2,751,330
  • Weight 219 g vs 228 g
  • Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
  • Wired charging 67 W vs 80 W
OPPO Find N6
5
OPPO · 2026Find N6
9.5
40% cheaper ≈ $1,350
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,538 vs 3,390
  • Active use (test) 15.8 h vs 14.8 h
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 7,114 vs 5,090
  • Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,627,421 vs 2,751,330
OPPO Find N5
6
OPPO · 2025Find N5
9.2
Same price ≈ $2,300
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,218 vs 3,390
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 6,215 vs 5,090
  • 4K selfie video
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • Battery capacity 5,600 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
7
Motorola · 2026Razr 70 Ultra
9.4
33% cheaper ≈ $1,500
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,651 vs 3,390
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Active use (test) 16.6 h vs 14.8 h
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8
Google · 2026Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.6
15% cheaper ≈ $1,900
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 5,446 vs 3,390
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3×
  • 4K selfie video
  • Main camera 48 MP vs 200 MP
  • Wired charging 30 W vs 80 W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
9
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8
8.8
26% cheaper ≈ $1,650
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,619 vs 3,390
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 6,459 vs 5,090
  • 4K video frame rate 120 fps vs 60 fps
  • Main camera 50 MP vs 200 MP
  • Battery capacity 4,800 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
10
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z TriFold
9.0
40% pricier ≈ $3,100
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,710 vs 3,390
  • AnTuTu score 2,926,532 vs 2,751,330
  • Screen size 10″ vs 8″
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 80 W
  • Battery capacity 5,600 mAh vs 6,900 mAh
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare