Same price ≈ $210
- AnTuTu score 732,904 vs 365,008
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,825 vs 1,021
- RAM 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Battery capacity 3,650 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Screen size 6.1″ vs 6.4″
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Samsung Galaxy A50
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Samsung Galaxy A50
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Galaxy A50 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Galaxy A50
Same price ≈ $210
- AnTuTu score 611,930 vs 365,008
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,000 vs 1,021
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
- Main camera 12 MP vs 25 MP
- Battery capacity 3,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
10% cheaper ≈ $190
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 1,530 vs 1,021
- NFC
- Max video 4K vs 1080p
- AnTuTu score 208,315 vs 365,008
- Battery capacity 3,100 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
10% cheaper ≈ $190
- Wireless charging
- Wired charging 18 W vs 15 W
- Storage (base) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Main camera 16 MP vs 25 MP
- Battery capacity 3,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
Same price ≈ $210
- NFC
- Stereo speakers
- Max video 4K vs 1080p
- OLED panel
- Battery capacity 3,400 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
5% pricier ≈ $220
- Main camera 48 MP vs 25 MP
- Optical stabilisation
- NFC
- AnTuTu score 352,699 vs 365,008
- Peak brightness 400 nits vs 650 nits
14% pricier ≈ $240
- AnTuTu score 751,826 vs 365,008
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,978 vs 1,021
- Wired charging 40 W vs 15 W
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Weight 192 g vs 166 g
5% pricier ≈ $220
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,542 vs 1,021
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Main camera 12 MP vs 25 MP
- Battery capacity 2,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
24% cheaper ≈ $160
- Main camera 48 MP vs 25 MP
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 1,547 vs 1,021
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
- OLED panel
- Battery capacity 3,340 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
Same price ≈ $210
- Main camera 48 MP vs 25 MP
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Wired charging 18 W vs 15 W
- OLED panel
- Storage (max) 64 GB vs 128 GB