Same price ≈ $460
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Memory card slot
- Weight 192 g vs 218 g
- Peak brightness 1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Telephoto camera
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Realme GT5 Pro
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Realme GT5 Pro
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the GT5 Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the GT5 Pro
4% pricier ≈ $480
- Weight 195 g vs 218 g
- Selfie camera 50 MP vs 32 MP
- Wireless charging power 66 W vs 50 W
- AnTuTu score 1,769,874 vs 1,981,149
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 5,069 vs 6,783
Same price ≈ $460
- AnTuTu score 2,486,114 vs 1,981,149
- RAM 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Wireless charging
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,400 mAh
9% pricier ≈ $500
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Main camera 54 MP vs 50 MP
- Pixel density 526 ppi vs 450 ppi
- Peak brightness 1,400 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
Same price ≈ $450
- AnTuTu score 2,727,275 vs 1,981,149
- Battery capacity 6,100 mAh vs 5,400 mAh
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,767 vs 6,783
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
9% cheaper ≈ $420
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx4
- Optical zoom 5× vs 2.7×
- Pixel density 522 ppi vs 450 ppi
- AnTuTu score 1,268,538 vs 1,981,149
- Active use (test) 10.2 h vs 14.3 h
11% cheaper ≈ $410
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Weight 190 g vs 218 g
- Thickness 8 mm vs 9.2 mm
- Peak brightness 1,400 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Telephoto camera
7% cheaper ≈ $430
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx4
- Wired charging 120 W vs 100 W
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,081 vs 6,783
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,400 mAh
- Active use (test) 12.5 h vs 14.3 h
7% pricier ≈ $490
- AnTuTu score 3,105,769 vs 1,981,149
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,740 vs 6,783
- Battery capacity 6,100 mAh vs 5,400 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
9% cheaper ≈ $420
- RAM 18 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 204 g vs 218 g
- Thickness 8.7 mm vs 9.2 mm
- Peak brightness 1,450 nits vs 4,500 nits
- AnTuTu score 1,481,118 vs 1,981,149