≈ $65
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Process 12 nm vs 22 nm
- Peak brightness 500 nits vs 450 nits
- CPU frequency 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OSCAL Flat 2C
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OSCAL Flat 2C
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Flat 2C — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Flat 2C
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Process 12 nm vs 22 nm
- Pixel density 260 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 8 MP
≈ $140
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Energy class A vs B
- Drop resistance class D vs C
- CPU frequency 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
≈ $140
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Drop resistance class D vs C
- CPU frequency 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
≈ $110
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 64 GB
- Storage (base) 256 GB vs 64 GB
- Pixel density 215 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Dual SIM
≈ $75
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Screen size 6.8″ vs 6.6″
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4
- CPU frequency 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Weight 200 g vs 193 g
≈ $110
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Peak brightness 1,500 nits vs 450 nits
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 64 GB
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 8 MP
≈ $100
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Peak brightness 600 nits vs 450 nits
- Battery charge cycles 800 vs 1,100
- Thickness 9.2 mm vs 8.8 mm
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Weight 185 g vs 193 g
- Peak brightness 460 nits vs 450 nits
- Pixel density 215 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Dual SIM
- RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 64 GB
- Energy class A vs B
- Pixel density 202 ppi vs 269 ppi
- CPU cores 4 vs 8