Same price ≈ $490
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Stereo speakers
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx5
- Weight 194 g vs 183 g
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OPPO Reno12 Pro (China)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OPPO Reno12 Pro (China)
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Reno12 Pro (China) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Reno12 Pro (China)
Same price ≈ $490
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Battery capacity 6,100 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Telephoto camera
- Selfie camera 16 MP vs 50 MP
4% pricier ≈ $500
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Stereo speakers
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- RAM 12 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 192 g vs 183 g
6% cheaper ≈ $450
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Stereo speakers
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 4K video frame rate 30 fps vs 60 fps
- Weight 192 g vs 183 g
6% cheaper ≈ $450
- Stereo speakers
- Battery capacity 5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Peak brightness 2,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- RAM 12 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU frequency 2.4 GHz vs 3.35 GHz
Same price ≈ $490
- Peak brightness 2,800 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Pixel density 453 ppi vs 394 ppi
- Resolution (width) 1,260 px vs 1,080 px
- RAM 12 GB vs 16 GB
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx5
Same price ≈ $480
- Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Stereo speakers
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Wired charging 45 W vs 80 W
- Telephoto camera
Same price ≈ $490
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- RAM 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 237 g vs 183 g
- Thickness 8.9 mm vs 7.6 mm
10% pricier ≈ $530
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Stereo speakers
- Weight 197 g vs 183 g
- Selfie camera 32 MP vs 50 MP
8% pricier ≈ $520
- Peak brightness 4,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Wireless charging
- Stereo speakers
- CPU frequency 3 GHz vs 3.35 GHz
- Weight 199 g vs 183 g