14% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- Wired charging 90 W vs 80 W
- Storage (base) 1,000 GB vs 256 GB
- Max video 8K vs 4K
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
- Pixel density 416 ppi vs 450 ppi
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OPPO Find X9 Pro
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OPPO Find X9 Pro
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Find X9 Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Find X9 Pro
10% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- Measured brightness 1,930 nits vs 1,175 nits
- Wired charging 90 W vs 80 W
- Battery capacity 6,040 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
- AnTuTu score 2,346,352 vs 2,719,560
28% cheaper ≈ $1,300
- AnTuTu score 3,400,423 vs 2,719,560
- Weight 203 g vs 224 g
- Pixel density 460 ppi vs 450 ppi
- Battery capacity 7,025 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
- Drop resistance class D vs C
18% pricier ≈ $2,150
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- Wired charging 100 W vs 80 W
- Measured brightness 1,935 nits vs 1,175 nits
- Active use (test) 15.8 h vs 21.9 h
- Battery capacity 6,600 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
37% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- Wired charging 120 W vs 80 W
- Peak brightness 7,000 nits vs 3,600 nits
- Measured brightness 2,262 nits vs 1,175 nits
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
- Active use (test) 20.4 h vs 21.9 h
33% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- AnTuTu score 2,777,490 vs 2,719,560
- Wired charging 90 W vs 80 W
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,896 vs 9,697
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
- Active use (test) 19.1 h vs 21.9 h
38% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- RAM 24 GB vs 16 GB
- AnTuTu score 3,229,764 vs 2,719,560
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Peak brightness 1,800 nits vs 3,600 nits
- Telephoto camera
11% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 3,600 nits
- Measured brightness 1,578 nits vs 1,175 nits
- Charged in 30 min 94% vs 54%
- AnTuTu score 2,017,400 vs 2,719,560
- Battery capacity 5,600 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
40% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- AnTuTu score 3,647,824 vs 2,719,560
- Wired charging 120 W vs 80 W
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 3,600 nits
- Battery capacity 7,100 mAh vs 7,500 mAh
- Active use (test) 19.1 h vs 21.9 h
49% pricier ≈ $2,700
- Measured brightness 1,965 nits vs 1,175 nits
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Max video 8K vs 4K
- Major OS updates promised 2 vs 5
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 7,500 mAh