≈ $840
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 2,500 nits
- AnTuTu score 2,914,061 vs 2,710,432
- Measured brightness 1,816 nits vs 1,157 nits
- Optical zoom 3.7× vs 6×
- Active use (test) 13.6 h vs 16.3 h
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OPPO Find X8 Ultra
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OPPO Find X8 Ultra
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Find X8 Ultra — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Find X8 Ultra
≈ $730
- AnTuTu score 2,998,904 vs 2,710,432
- Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- Wired charging 90 W vs 100 W
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,082 vs 9,503
≈ $900
- AnTuTu score 3,030,376 vs 2,710,432
- Measured brightness 1,588 nits vs 1,157 nits
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,710 vs 9,503
- Battery capacity 5,410 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- Wired charging 90 W vs 100 W
≈ $870
- Measured brightness 2,113 nits vs 1,157 nits
- AnTuTu score 2,982,875 vs 2,710,432
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Active use (test) 12.8 h vs 16.3 h
- Optical zoom 3.7× vs 6×
≈ $1,050
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- Active use (test) 21.8 h vs 16.3 h
- Optical zoom 3× vs 6×
- 4K video frame rate 60 fps vs 120 fps
≈ $1,100
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- AnTuTu score 3,647,824 vs 2,710,432
- Battery capacity 7,100 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- Optical zoom 3.7× vs 6×
- Pixel density 458 ppi vs 510 ppi
≈ $860
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Battery capacity 7,000 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- Active use (test) 21.1 h vs 16.3 h
- Optical zoom 2× vs 6×
- AnTuTu score 2,141,861 vs 2,710,432
≈ $330
- Battery capacity 7,410 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- AnTuTu score 2,926,668 vs 2,710,432
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
≈ $720
- Battery capacity 7,200 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- Optical zoom 2.7× vs 6×
- Wired charging 90 W vs 100 W
≈ $780
- Battery capacity 7,500 mAh vs 6,100 mAh
- Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Active use (test) 20.8 h vs 16.3 h
- AnTuTu score 2,456,317 vs 2,710,432
- Pixel density 416 ppi vs 510 ppi