Same price ≈ $180
- Battery capacity 8,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Weight 193 g vs 221 g
- AnTuTu score 969,048 vs 1,994,239
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,077 vs 6,472
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OPPO Find X7 Ultra
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OPPO Find X7 Ultra
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Find X7 Ultra — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Find X7 Ultra
Same price ≈ $180
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 174 g vs 221 g
- eSIM
- AnTuTu score 763,420 vs 1,994,239
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,002 vs 6,472
Same price ≈ $180
- Battery capacity 8,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Weight 213 g vs 221 g
- Optical stabilisation
- Telephoto camera
17% pricier ≈ $210
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 195 g vs 221 g
- AnTuTu score 1,027,925 vs 1,994,239
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,062 vs 6,472
51% pricier ≈ $270
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Weight 191 g vs 221 g
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
34% pricier ≈ $240
- Battery capacity 7,620 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- AnTuTu score 2,052,566 vs 1,994,239
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
57% pricier ≈ $280
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Weight 200 g vs 221 g
- Thickness 8.5 mm vs 9.5 mm
- Peak brightness 2,150 nits vs 4,500 nits
- AnTuTu score 1,649,673 vs 1,994,239
15% cheaper ≈ $150
- Battery capacity 6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- eSIM
- Weight 197 g vs 221 g
- Peak brightness 1,800 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Optical stabilisation
45% pricier ≈ $260
- Battery capacity 7,550 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- AnTuTu score 2,292,541 vs 1,994,239
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
57% pricier ≈ $280
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Memory card slot
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx8
- Telephoto camera