4% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- AnTuTu score 999,348 vs 703,131
- Wired charging 45 W vs 33 W
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Optical stabilisation
- Wireless charging
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OPPO Find N
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OPPO Find N
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Find N — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Find N
Same price ≈ $1,200
- Wired charging 67 W vs 33 W
- AnTuTu score 962,082 vs 703,131
- RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Wireless charging
21% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Wired charging 67 W vs 33 W
- AnTuTu score 1,050,139 vs 703,131
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Wireless charging
- Pixel density 360 ppi vs 370 ppi
21% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Wired charging 66 W vs 33 W
- Optical zoom 5× vs 2×
- Battery capacity 4,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Selfie camera 16 MP vs 32 MP
- Weight 311 g vs 275 g
7% pricier ≈ $1,250
- AnTuTu score 1,235,547 vs 703,131
- Wired charging 67 W vs 33 W
- Optical zoom 5× vs 2×
- Pixel density 360 ppi vs 370 ppi
- Selfie camera 20 MP vs 32 MP
21% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Main camera 108 MP vs 50 MP
- Wired charging 67 W vs 33 W
- Battery capacity 5,020 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Optical stabilisation
30% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Wired charging 66 W vs 33 W
- Battery capacity 4,750 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- 4K selfie video
- Optical stabilisation
- Telephoto camera
12% pricier ≈ $1,300
- AnTuTu score 949,796 vs 703,131
- Wired charging 44 W vs 33 W
- Peak brightness 1,600 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Wireless charging
- Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
5% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- AnTuTu score 1,589,991 vs 703,131
- Wired charging 66 W vs 33 W
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,461 vs 3,478
- Selfie camera 20 MP vs 32 MP
18% cheaper ≈ $950
- Wired charging 67 W vs 33 W
- Peak brightness 2,800 nits vs 1,000 nits
- AnTuTu score 968,130 vs 703,131
- Wireless charging
- Main camera 48 MP vs 50 MP