≈ $75
- Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh
- Main camera 8 MP vs 5 MP
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 2 MP
- Pixel density 267 ppi vs 295 ppi
- Weight 205 g vs 191 g
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Nokia C02
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Nokia C02
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the C02 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the C02
≈ $65
- Max video 1080p vs 720p
- Weight 178 g vs 191 g
- CPU frequency 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- Pixel density 196 ppi vs 295 ppi
- Screen size 5″ vs 5.4″
≈ $120
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh
- Main camera 8 MP vs 5 MP
- Storage (max) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Pixel density 267 ppi vs 295 ppi
- Weight 196 g vs 191 g
≈ $110
- Main camera 8 MP vs 5 MP
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 2 MP
- Max video 1080p vs 720p
- Storage (max) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Storage (base) 16 GB vs 32 GB
≈ $95
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh
- Main camera 8 MP vs 5 MP
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 2 MP
- Pixel density 270 ppi vs 295 ppi
≈ $65
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 2 MP
- CPU cores 8 vs 4
- Rear cameras 2 vs 1
- Storage (max) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Pixel density 171 ppi vs 295 ppi
≈ $55
- Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh
- Selfie camera 5 MP vs 2 MP
- Screen size 6.3″ vs 5.4″
- Pixel density 170 ppi vs 295 ppi
- CPU frequency 1.3 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
≈ $85
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh
- Main camera 8 MP vs 5 MP
- RAM 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Pixel density 269 ppi vs 295 ppi
≈ $65
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- CPU frequency 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- Max video 1080p vs 720p
- Pixel density 179 ppi vs 295 ppi
- Dual SIM
- Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh
- Main camera 8 MP vs 5 MP
- NFC
- Pixel density 269 ppi vs 295 ppi
- Weight 203 g vs 191 g