How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Motorola Razr 2024
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Motorola Razr 2024

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Razr 2024 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Motorola Razr 2024
Motorola · 2024
Razr 2024
6.9″Dimensity 7300X4,200 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $270
5.6

Alternatives to the Razr 2024

ZTE nubia Flip
1
ZTE · 2024nubia Flip
5.7
Same price ≈ $270
  • RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 256 GB
  • Battery capacity 4,310 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Optical stabilisation
  • Wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
2
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Z Flip6
6.4
45% pricier ≈ $400
  • AnTuTu score 1,400,594 vs 773,565
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,265 vs 2,900
  • RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Wired charging 25 W vs 30 W
nubia Flip
3
nubia · 2024Flip
4.8
16% pricier ≈ $320
  • Battery capacity 4,310 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Wired charging 33 W vs 30 W
  • Pixel density 439 ppi vs 413 ppi
  • Water resistance (IPx) IPx2 vs IPx8
  • Optical stabilisation
Motorola Razr+ 2024
4
Motorola · 2024Razr+ 2024
7.0
27% pricier ≈ $350
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 5,601 vs 2,900
  • AnTuTu score 1,158,987 vs 773,565
  • RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Ultra-wide camera
Tecno Phantom V Flip2
5
Tecno · 2024Phantom V Flip2
5.7
  • Wired charging 70 W vs 30 W
  • Battery capacity 4,720 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Charged in 30 min 100% vs 59%
  • Wireless charging
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,544 vs 2,900
nubia Flip 2
6
nubia · 2025Flip 2
5.2
38% pricier ≈ $380
  • Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Wired charging 33 W vs 30 W
  • Pixel density 439 ppi vs 413 ppi
  • Optical stabilisation
  • Wireless charging
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
7
Tecno · 2024Phantom V Fold2
6.5
60% pricier ≈ $440
  • Wired charging 70 W vs 30 W
  • AnTuTu score 1,158,040 vs 773,565
  • Battery capacity 5,750 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Measured brightness 573 nits vs 1,288 nits
  • Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx8
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
8
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2
91% pricier ≈ $530
  • AnTuTu score 1,355,845 vs 773,565
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,108 vs 2,900
  • CPU frequency 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Wired charging 25 W vs 30 W
ZTE nubia Flip3
9
ZTE · 2026nubia Flip3
6.3
  • Battery capacity 4,610 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Wired charging 33 W vs 30 W
  • Pixel density 439 ppi vs 413 ppi
  • Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx8
  • Optical stabilisation
ZTE nubia Flip2
10
ZTE · 2025nubia Flip2
5.2
  • RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 256 GB
  • Battery capacity 4,325 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
  • Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 3,000 nits
  • Optical stabilisation
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare