Same price ≈ $640
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 6,150 mAh vs 5,650 mAh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Wireless charging
- AnTuTu score 2,791,585 vs 2,967,184
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Honor Magic7
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Honor Magic7
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Magic7 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Magic7
6% pricier ≈ $670
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,650 mAh
- Optical zoom 3.7× vs 3×
- AnTuTu score 2,609,095 vs 2,967,184
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,152 vs 9,598
5% pricier ≈ $660
- Optical stabilisation
- Weight 187 g vs 199 g
- Main camera aperture f/1.6 vs f/1.9
- AnTuTu score 2,779,129 vs 2,967,184
- Wired charging 90 W vs 100 W
5% pricier ≈ $660
- Optical stabilisation
- Optical zoom 3.7× vs 3×
- Max video 8K vs 4K
- AnTuTu score 2,152,790 vs 2,967,184
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,311 vs 9,598
10% pricier ≈ $690
- Optical stabilisation
- Optical zoom 4.3× vs 3×
- Max video 8K vs 4K
- AnTuTu score 2,432,004 vs 2,967,184
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,436 vs 9,598
Same price ≈ $650
- RAM 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 6,150 mAh vs 5,650 mAh
- Peak brightness 2,000 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Wireless charging
14% cheaper ≈ $540
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,650 mAh
- AnTuTu score 3,068,164 vs 2,967,184
- Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Selfie camera 20 MP vs 50 MP
Same price ≈ $650
- AnTuTu score 3,569,354 vs 2,967,184
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 6,300 mAh vs 5,650 mAh
- Peak brightness 3,500 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Screen size 6.3″ vs 6.8″
19% pricier ≈ $750
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 6,100 mAh vs 5,650 mAh
- Optical zoom 5× vs 3×
- Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,637 vs 9,598
6% cheaper ≈ $590
- Optical stabilisation
- Optical zoom 3.8× vs 3×
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- AnTuTu score 2,237,843 vs 2,967,184
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,702 vs 9,598