Same price ≈ $1,600
- AnTuTu score 2,444,132 vs 2,017,400
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,143 vs 6,787
- Peak brightness 2,500 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Honor Magic6 Pro
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Honor Magic6 Pro
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Magic6 Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Magic6 Pro
14% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Optical zoom 6× vs 2.5×
- AnTuTu score 2,701,287 vs 2,017,400
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,819 vs 6,787
- Measured brightness 1,333 nits vs 1,578 nits
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 5,000 nits
18% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- AnTuTu score 2,751,909 vs 2,017,400
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,885 vs 6,787
- Major OS updates promised 5 vs 4
- Measured brightness 1,364 nits vs 1,578 nits
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 5,000 nits
12% pricier ≈ $1,850
- AnTuTu score 2,719,560 vs 2,017,400
- Battery capacity 7,500 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
- Active use (test) 21.9 h vs 14.1 h
- Peak brightness 3,600 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Measured brightness 1,175 nits vs 1,578 nits
21% cheaper ≈ $1,300
- AnTuTu score 2,746,604 vs 2,017,400
- Wired charging 120 W vs 80 W
- Battery capacity 6,500 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
- Wireless charging
- Selfie camera 16 MP vs 50 MP
Same price ≈ $1,650
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,843 vs 6,787
- AnTuTu score 2,346,352 vs 2,017,400
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Screen size 6.3″ vs 6.8″
13% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- Wired charging 125 W vs 80 W
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- AnTuTu score 1,485,409 vs 2,017,400
- Battery capacity 4,500 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
20% cheaper ≈ $1,300
- AnTuTu score 3,400,423 vs 2,017,400
- Battery capacity 7,025 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,557 vs 6,787
- Measured brightness 1,114 nits vs 1,578 nits
- Peak brightness 3,600 nits vs 5,000 nits
36% cheaper ≈ $1,050
- Battery capacity 5,800 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
- Active use (test) 16.7 h vs 14.1 h
- Optical zoom 3.5× vs 2.5×
- AnTuTu score 1,154,641 vs 2,017,400
- Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 5,000 nits
24% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- Refresh rate 592 Hz vs 120 Hz
- AnTuTu score 2,687,260 vs 2,017,400
- Battery capacity 7,050 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
- Peak brightness 2,000 nits vs 5,000 nits
- Telephoto camera