Same price ≈ $2,700
- AnTuTu score 2,702,580 vs 1,639,368
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,695 vs 6,542
- Active use (test) 15.8 h vs 14.7 h
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the ROG Phone 8 Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ROG Phone 8 Pro
31% pricier ≈ $3,500
- AnTuTu score 2,313,311 vs 1,639,368
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,019 vs 6,542
- Rear cameras 5 vs 3
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 1,024 GB
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
30% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- AnTuTu score 2,701,287 vs 1,639,368
- Major OS updates promised 5 vs 2
- Optical zoom 6× vs 3×
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
39% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- AnTuTu score 2,017,400 vs 1,639,368
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Major OS updates promised 4 vs 2
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
32% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- AnTuTu score 2,719,560 vs 1,639,368
- Major OS updates promised 5 vs 2
- Battery capacity 7,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
15% cheaper ≈ $2,300
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- AnTuTu score 2,854,496 vs 1,639,368
- Optical zoom 10× vs 3×
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Measured brightness 1,156 nits vs 1,765 nits
- Wired charging 120 W vs 65 W
- AnTuTu score 2,386,903 vs 1,639,368
- Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- RAM 12 GB vs 24 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Wired charging 120 W vs 65 W
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Battery capacity 5,800 mAh vs 5,500 mAh
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Telephoto camera
20% cheaper ≈ $2,150
- AnTuTu score 2,447,714 vs 1,639,368
- Wired charging 120 W vs 65 W
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,422 vs 6,542
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Wireless charging
20% cheaper ≈ $2,150
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- AnTuTu score 2,723,497 vs 1,639,368
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 11,494 vs 6,542
- RAM 16 GB vs 24 GB
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 165 Hz